Talk:Zafina punishers (Tekken 7): Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Zafina punishers (Tekken 7)
RogerDodger (talk | contribs) m (RogerDodger moved page Talk:Zafina punishers to Talk:Zafina punishers (Tekken 7) without leaving a redirect: the great Tekken 8 migration) Tag: Script |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Basically nobody ever writes it b+1:1+2 to the point it becomes confusing to read. And with how often the move is in discussion it has stabilized in use. "b1:1+2" is the shortest recognizable notation much the same way EWGF is notated as that. It really is different from every other move where the community commonly uses both "f1+4" and "f+1+4". With this move even people who always put the plus sign everywhere pretty much don't bother. --[[User:Hating Mirror|Hating Mirror]] ([[User talk:Hating Mirror|talk]]) 21:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC) | :Basically nobody ever writes it b+1:1+2 to the point it becomes confusing to read. And with how often the move is in discussion it has stabilized in use. "b1:1+2" is the shortest recognizable notation much the same way EWGF is notated as that. It really is different from every other move where the community commonly uses both "f1+4" and "f+1+4". With this move even people who always put the plus sign everywhere pretty much don't bother. --[[User:Hating Mirror|Hating Mirror]] ([[User talk:Hating Mirror|talk]]) 21:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC) | ||
:: The simple solution I would propose then is to just edit the refnote on the main Zaf page to say "b+1:1+2 is written as b1:1+2 throughout for brevity" --[[User:Kalki|Kalki]] ([[User talk:Kalki|talk]]) 22:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:00, 25 January 2024
Reasoning for notating Cursed Crow as b1 instead of b+1
Why is Cursed Crow specifically notated as b1 instead of b+1? There's a refnote which states "b1:1+2 is written as b1:1+2 and not b+1:1+2 (it's an exception to the rule)" but there's no reasoning provided. To my mind, there seems to be no reason to make an exception here either.
- Basically nobody ever writes it b+1:1+2 to the point it becomes confusing to read. And with how often the move is in discussion it has stabilized in use. "b1:1+2" is the shortest recognizable notation much the same way EWGF is notated as that. It really is different from every other move where the community commonly uses both "f1+4" and "f+1+4". With this move even people who always put the plus sign everywhere pretty much don't bother. --Hating Mirror (talk) 21:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)