Mixup:Lidia-122-simple.gbt: Difference between revisions

From Wavu Wiki, the 🌊 wavy Tekken wiki
(Created page with "<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <gambit:document xmlns:gambit="http://gambit.sourceforge.net/" version="0.1"> <colors> <player id="-1" red="0" green="0" blue="0" /> <pl...")
 
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:


{ { "CFT.1" "CFT.2,3" "CFT.3" "CFT.4" "CFT.1+2" "TAW.1" "TAW.2" "TAW.3,1" "TAW.4" }
{ { "CFT.1" "CFT.2,3" "CFT.3" "CFT.4" "CFT.1+2" "TAW.1" "TAW.2" "TAW.3,1" "TAW.4" }
{ "b" "d" "b,d" "d,b" "d+1" "uf+4" "3:2" "ssr,b" "ssr,d" "swr" "swl" }
{ "b" "d" "b,d" "d,b" "db+1" "uf+4" "3:2" "ssr,b" "ssr,d" "swr" "swl" }
}
}
"Lidia 1,2,2 on hit in mirror on infinite stage.
"Lidia 1,2,2 on hit in mirror on infinite stage.
Line 20: Line 20:
Assumes {{P2}} doesn't parry and doesn't react to second stance but rather commits to a particular strategy from start.
Assumes {{P2}} doesn't parry and doesn't react to second stance but rather commits to a particular strategy from start.


Note that d+1 and uf+4 beat CFT.4. Against many chars CFT.4 evades these options.
Note that {{P2|db+1}} and {{P2|uf+4}} beat {{P1|CFT.4}}. Against many chars CFT.4 evades these options.


Note that CFT.2,3 beats all steps. Against many chars it loses to ssr."
Assumes that CFT.2,3 beats all steps, but note that this isn't always the case."


{
{

Latest revision as of 06:05, 9 March 2022

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<gambit:document xmlns:gambit="http://gambit.sourceforge.net/" version="0.1">
<colors>
<player id="-1" red="0" green="0" blue="0" />
<player id="0" red="154" green="205" blue="50" />
<player id="1" red="255" green="0" blue="0" />
<player id="2" red="0" green="0" blue="255" />
</colors>
<font size="10" family="74" face="Arial" style="90" weight="92" />
<numbers decimals="4"/>
<game>
<nfgfile>
NFG 1 R "Lidia 1,2,2 on hit" { "Attacker" "Defender" }

{ { "CFT.1" "CFT.2,3" "CFT.3" "CFT.4" "CFT.1+2" "TAW.1" "TAW.2" "TAW.3,1" "TAW.4" }
{ "b" "d" "b,d" "d,b" "db+1" "uf+4" "3:2" "ssr,b" "ssr,d" "swr" "swl" }
}
"Lidia 1,2,2 on hit in mirror on infinite stage.

Assumes {{P2}} doesn't parry and doesn't react to second stance but rather commits to a particular strategy from start.

Note that {{P2|db+1}} and {{P2|uf+4}} beat {{P1|CFT.4}}. Against many chars CFT.4 evades these options.

Assumes that CFT.2,3 beats all steps, but note that this isn't always the case."

{
{ "" -1, 1 }
{ "" 0, 0 }
{ "" 33, -33 }
{ "" 3, -3 }
{ "" -80, 80 }
{ "" -8, 8 }
{ "" 28, -28 }
{ "" 61, -61 }
{ "" -60, 60 }
{ "" -60, 60 }
{ "" -30, 30 }
{ "" -8, 8 }
{ "" 38, -38 }
{ "" 38, -38 }
{ "" 35, -35 }
{ "" 35, -35 }
{ "" 35, -35 }
{ "" -1, 1 }
{ "" -60, 60 }
{ "" -7, 7 }
{ "" 75, -75 }
{ "" 75, -75 }
{ "" 28, -28 }
{ "" 28, -28 }
{ "" 28, -28 }
{ "" 32, -32 }
{ "" -8, 8 }
{ "" -67, 67 }
{ "" 34, -34 }
{ "" 32, -32 }
{ "" 32, -32 }
{ "" 32, -32 }
{ "" -29, 29 }
{ "" 31, -31 }
{ "" 59, -59 }
{ "" 27, -27 }
{ "" 59, -59 }
{ "" -60, 60 }
{ "" -60, 60 }
{ "" -20, 20 }
{ "" 2, -2 }
{ "" 51, -51 }
{ "" -7, 7 }
{ "" -69, 69 }
{ "" -85, 85 }
{ "" 2, -2 }
{ "" 51, -51 }
{ "" -60, 60 }
{ "" 28, -28 }
{ "" -60, 60 }
{ "" -40, 40 }
{ "" -1, 1 }
{ "" 28, -28 }
{ "" -7, 7 }
{ "" -69, 69 }
{ "" -85, 85 }
{ "" -1, 1 }
{ "" 28, -28 }
{ "" -60, 60 }
{ "" -40, 40 }
{ "" -60, 60 }
{ "" -60, 60 }
{ "" 31, -31 }
{ "" 32, -32 }
{ "" 28, -28 }
{ "" 35, -35 }
{ "" -40, 40 }
{ "" -1, 1 }
{ "" 42, -42 }
{ "" -7, 7 }
{ "" -69, 69 }
{ "" -85, 85 }
{ "" -1, 1 }
{ "" 42, -42 }
{ "" 30, -30 }
{ "" -40, 40 }
{ "" -7, 7 }
{ "" -69, 69 }
{ "" -85, 85 }
{ "" 30, -30 }
{ "" -40, 40 }
{ "" -1, 1 }
{ "" 33, -33 }
{ "" 3, -3 }
{ "" -1, 1 }
{ "" -60, 60 }
{ "" 32, -32 }
{ "" -80, 80 }
{ "" -29, 29 }
{ "" 31, -31 }
{ "" 51, -51 }
{ "" 2, -2 }
{ "" 28, -28 }
{ "" -1, 1 }
{ "" 42, -42 }
{ "" -1, 1 }
{ "" -40, 40 }
{ "" 30, -30 }
}
1 2 18 26 33 41 52 68 75 3 4 19 5 34 42 53 69 76 82 0 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 83 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 6 12 20 27 35 43 54 70 77 7 13 21 28 36 44 55 71 78 8 14 22 29 37 45 56 72 79 9 15 23 30 38 46 57 73 80 10 16 24 31 39 47 58 74 81 11 17 25 32 40 48 49 51 50 67 66 65 64 63 59 61 60 62 
</nfgfile>
<analysis type="list">
<description>
One equilibrium by solving a linear program in strategic game
</description>
<profile type="mixed">
24134210371/157140168637,61261872930/157140168637,0,21414066922/157140168637,23233778731/157140168637,90945635870/1099981180459,3542029980/157140168637,0,73933832051/1099981180459,82945735508/157140168637,25523197203/157140168637,49340557/157140168637,0,34098203396/157140168637,4841627356/157140168637,0,165012212/157140168637,0,9517052405/157140168637,0
</profile>
</analysis>
</game>
</gambit:document>