The ubiquitous f,F+2,F mixup on block, in the mirror
B~punish | DB | jab | SSL~b~punish | SSR~b~punish | B~wait | SSL~b~wait | SSR~b~wait | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEN.3 | 6 | -76 | 20 | 22 | 22 | 6 | 22 | 22 |
SEN.2 | 0 | 20 | -6 | -67 | 20 | 0 | -67 | 20 |
SEN.4 | 7 | 45 | -43 | -75 | -74 | 7 | -75 | -74 |
SEN.3+4 | 22 | -80 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 |
SEN.1 | -43 | 42 | 2 | -43 | -74 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SEN.1,qcf+2 | 36 | 42 | 8 | 36 | -74 | -67 | -67 | -74 |
SEN.1+3 | 20 | -76 | -6 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
SEN.1+2 | -24 | 51 | 6 | 51 | -77 | -24 | 51 | -77 |
Nash equilibrium with payoff -4.99
- SEN.3
- 0.35
- SEN.2
- 0.39
- SEN.1+2
- 0.26
- DB
- 0.28
- SSL~b~punish
- 0.29
- SSR~b~punish
- 0.44
Payoff for dominated options
- SEN.4
- -41.52
- SEN.3+4
- -6.09
- SEN.1
- -33.15
- SEN.1,qcf+2
- -10.46
- SEN.1+3
- -6.44
- B~punish
- 4.28
- jab
- -6.17
- B~wait
- 4.28
- SSL~b~wait
- 4.99
- SSR~b~wait
- 4.99
Need to add defender SSR option, and clarify how SEN.1,qcf+2 is being handled (hit-confirm or not)